The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) remain the most challenging group in terms of available noninvasive treatment modalities. AIM: The study sought to assess the role of combination therapy with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) and daily tadalafil 5 mg in a highly select group of patients with severe vasculogenic ED through a double-blind, randomized trial. METHODS: Forty-eight sexually active men were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of LiST 3 times weekly and tadalafil 5 mg once daily (n = 34) or sham therapy and tadalafil (n = 17) for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed at 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. OUTCOMES: Improvement of erectile function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) or 6-item IIEF and the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised (1) the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 1 month after completion of treatment, (2) the difference between the groups in the "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary at 1 and 3 months, and (3) the treatment-related adverse events. The number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF (improvement of at least 7 points) was also assessed. RESULTS: After treatment, the absolute scores in the IIEF-EF were higher in patients receiving LiST and tadalafil vs sham therapy and tadalafil both at the 1-month (12.1 ± 2.4 vs 10.2 ± 1.7; P = .002) and at the 3-month (12.9 ± 2.1 vs 10.8 ± 1.8; P < .001) evaluation. Between the 2 groups, the proportion of "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary was not statistically significant, whereas the number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF was statistically significant only at the 3-month evaluation. No adverse events occurred. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Application of LiST in patients with severe vasculogenic ED receiving daily dose tadalafil may further improve erectile function compared with tadalafil as a stand-alone treatment on the short term. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Although we provided the first study in the field, severe vasculogenic ED was defined based on medical history and clinical examination and not based on penile ultrasound measures. CONCLUSION: The combination of 12 sessions LiST 3 times weekly and daily tadalafil for 4 weeks led to a 2-point difference in the IIEF-EF compared with sham therapy and daily tadalafil among patients with severe vasculogenic ED after 1 and 3 months from completion of treatment.

The Effect of Low-Intensity Shock Wave Therapy on Moderate Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted the first double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shock wave therapy (LiST) exclusively in patients with moderate erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized to 12 sessions of LiST (35) or sham therapy (35) twice weekly. Patients were evaluated at 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. The proportion of participants attaining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and the effect of LiST on erectile function, as well as on safety, were the study outcomes. RESULTS: At 3 months, MCID was attained by 27 (79%) patients in the LiST group compared to 0 patients in the sham group. The risk difference between the 2 groups was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66-93, p <0.001) and the baseline-adjusted mean between-group-difference in the IIEF-EF was 4.4 points (95% CI: 3.4-5.4, p <0.001). At 1 month, MCID was attained by 20 (59%) patients in the LiST group compared to 1 (2.9%) patient in the sham group. The risk difference between the 2 groups was 56% (95% CI: 38-73, p <0.001) and the baseline-adjusted mean between-group-difference in the IIEF-EF was 3.9 points (95% CI: 2.7-5.2, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve sessions of LiST twice weekly for 6 weeks with a treatment protocol of 5,000 impulses, 0.096 mJ/mm2 energy flux density and 5 Hz frequency are highly effective in patients with moderate erectile dysfunction. Still, further long-term randomized studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

The Effect of Combination Treatment With Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy and Tadalafil on Mild and Mild-To-Moderate Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Combination of different first-line treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. AIM: To conduct the first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) and tadalafil vs LiST and placebo in patients with mild or mild-to-moderate vasculogenic ED. METHODS: Fifty sexually active patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to 6 sessions of LiST twice weekly for 3 weeks and tadalafil (n = 25) or placebo (n = 25) once daily for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after completion of the treatment protocol. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain between the 2 groups at 3 months after treatment. Erectile function was also assessed at 1 and 6 months. The number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the IIEF-EF, as well as the safety of combination therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Adjusting for the baseline values, IIEF-EF improved by 0.8 points more (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.2 to 1.9, P = .12) at 1 month, 1 point more (95% CI = 0.1-1.9, P = .02) at 3 months and 1.7 points more (95% CI = 0.8-2.7, P < .001) at 6 months in patients treated with combination therapy compared to monotherapy. The number of patients attaining a MCID in the IIEF-EF between the 2 groups improved significantly only at the 3-month evaluation. No adverse events were reported during the whole study period. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Combination of LiST twice weekly for 3 weeks and tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 4 weeks may further ameliorate mild or mild-to-moderate vasculogenic ED compared to LiST monotherapy. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: We conducted the first randomized trial exploring the role of LiST and tadalafil in the management of ED. Conversely, our study lacks external validity due to its single-center design. CONCLUSION: The addition of daily low-dose tadalafil during application of LiST may further improve erectile function compared to application of LiST as a standalone treatment in patients with mild or mild-to-moderate vasculogenic ED. Still, further high-quality studies are warranted to corroborate our findings. Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Zilotis F, et al. The Effect of Combination Treatment With Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy and Tadalafil on Mild and Mild-To-Moderate Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Sex Med 2022;19:106-115.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Improves Erectile Function: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Animal studies postulate that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections improve key elements of the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To conduct the first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of PRP injections in patients with mild and moderate ED. METHODS: Sixty sexually active patients with mild and moderate ED were randomly assigned to two sessions, with a one-month difference, of 10 mL PRP (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) intracavernosal injections. An FDA-approved separation system was used. Patients were evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months after completion of the treatment protocol. A per-protocol analysis was applied. All participants withheld any ED treatment during the trial. OUTCOMES: The achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Domain (IIEF-EF) from baseline to 6 months after final treatment. Erectile function at all time points, as well as safety of PRP injections, were also evaluated. RESULTS: At 6 months, a MCID was achieved by 20/29 (69%) patients in the PRP group compared to 7/26 (27%) in the placebo group. The risk difference between the two groups was 42% (95%CI: 18-66), P < 0.001 and the baseline-adjusted mean between-group-difference in the IIEF-EF score was 3.9 points (95%CI: 1.8-5.9). Similarly, a statistically significant difference of both the number of participants attaining a MCID and the IIEF-EF score was also observed at the 1- and 3-month evaluation between the two groups. Accordingly, patients receiving PRP were more satisfied with the treatment. No adverse events were observed during the study period. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Intracavernosal PRP injection therapy used as outlined in this trial appears to be a safe and effective short-term treatment for the management of mild to moderate ED. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: We conducted the first clinical trial exploring the role of PRP in the management of ED. Conversely, our findings lack external validity due to single-center design. Furthermore, our results cannot be extrapolated to other PRP separation systems. CONCLUSIONS: PRP intracavernosal injections may be a promising addition to the urologist's armamentarium for the management of ED. Still, further high-quality studies are warranted to corroborate our findings. Evangelos P, Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Improves Erectile Function: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Sex Med 2021;18:926-935.

Comparing two different low-intensity shockwave therapy frequency protocols for nonbacterial chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite encouraging results, the optimal low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) protocol in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) remains unknown. We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial aiming to compare the efficacy and safety of six LiST sessions applied once or twice weekly. METHODS: Fifty patients with CP/CPPS type IIIb were randomly assigned to six LiST sessions once (Group A, n = 25) or twice weekly (Group B, n = 25). Both groups followed the same treatment protocol in terms of LiST application, impulses (5000/session), energy flux density (0.096 mJ/mm2 ) and frequency (5 Hz). Subsequently, all participants were evaluated at 1 and 3 months after completion of LiST protocol. RESULTS: At the follow-up evaluations, LiST significantly improved the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total, pain and quality of life scores, as well as the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Domain (IIEF-ED) in both groups (p < .001 for all measures). Comparing between the two groups, no significant differences were demonstrated in the NIH-CPSI total, pain, urinary and quality of life scores, as well as in the International Prostate Symptom Score, IIEF-ED, and LiST-induced pain at both follow-up evaluations. Accordingly, no adverse events and no dropouts were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: Six sessions of LiST applied once weekly for 6 weeks or twice weekly for 3 weeks seem to be equally safe and effective in patients with CP/CPPS. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary, since LiST gradually gains its place for the management of CP/CPPS.

Evaluation of a low-intensity shockwave therapy for chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no efficacious treatment method for chronic prostatitis type IIIb/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Aim of the study was to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) vs. sham treatment in CP/CPPS patients. METHODS: Patients with CP/CPPS diagnosis were randomized in this prospective, sham-controlled, double-blind study either to the active groups (Group B, C) who received 5000 shockwaves per session with energy flux density 0.1 mJ/mm2 or to the sham group (Group A) who received 5000 shockwaves from a visually identical sham probe. All groups underwent six sessions (once/week). LiST effects on pain, micturition, quality of life (QoL), and erectile function were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment. The parameters were investigated using validated questionnaires. Uroflowmetry and post void residual calculation were performed at baseline and at 4- and 12-week FU visit. Prostate mpMRI and PSA measurement were performed at baseline and 12-week FU visit. RESULTS: Overall, 45 men were randomized to the active (n = 30) and sham groups (n = 15). Regarding impact of LiST in National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total, pain, and QoL subdomains scores a clear and persistent in all FU timepoints improvement was found compared to sham treatment. NIH-CPSI urinary subdomain, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], PSA, and mpMRI-PIRADS scores did not differ between the two groups. The mean difference between the LiST and sham group in the change of the NIH-CPSI pain-domain score (Q1-4) from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment which was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.8, 4.7). Perineal LiST was easy and safe to perform without anesthesia or any side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: LiST seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for CP/CPPS, considerably improving pain and quality of life. Lack of any side-effects, and the potential for repetition make LiST a promising treatment choice for CP/CPPS patients.